The Speed of Now

Celeritas Nunc. Living, thinking, and deciding in a season that refuses to slow down.

A frantic pace is a familiar condition in modern life, yet there are periods when this pace becomes unusually intense. For several weeks at a time, daily experience can feel compressed, noisy and relentlessly social. Conversations multiply, invitations appear unexpectedly, and interactions extend far beyond habitual circles. People encounter neighbours more often, reconnect with relatives and speak with strangers who quickly become part of their short-term environment. This is not simply busyness. It is a heightened state of exchange where information, opinions and impressions move faster than the mind can easily process.

In such a period, the urge to communicate becomes almost compulsory. There is a sense that something important might be missed if one does not remain available, responsive and engaged. Messages are answered quickly, discussions continue late into the evening, and even moments of quiet are filled with planning the next exchange. This can be stimulating, even exhilarating. Ideas flow easily, curiosity sharpens, and the mind feels alert. Intellectual tasks benefit from this atmosphere because the brain is constantly fed with new material. Reading, writing, debating and learning new skills often feel easier than usual.

At the same time, this frantic pace has a cost. When the tempo of events in one’s surroundings becomes too fast, reflection suffers. Thoughts remain unfinished because they are interrupted by new inputs. Decisions are postponed or made hastily because there is no sense of mental space. While communication is frequent, understanding may be shallow. People speak more, yet listen less. This creates a paradox where connection increases, and clarity decreases.

In personal life, the effects are mixed. Relationships can be energised by frequent contact. Long-standing misunderstandings may be aired simply because people are talking more. Family ties can feel stronger due to regular exchanges, even if those exchanges are brief. Neighbourly relations may also improve, as repeated encounters create familiarity. However, the same intensity can also lead to friction. Small disagreements are more likely when people interact often without rest. There is less patience for nuance and more temptation to react immediately.

Travel often accompanies this kind of period. Movement between places mirrors the mental movement between topics and conversations. Short journeys, spontaneous visits and unplanned meetings become common. While travel can broaden perspective, it can also add to cognitive overload. Each new environment demands attention, further reducing the chance to pause and assess one’s direction.

From a lifestyle perspective, this is not a time suited to settling down or seeking deep rest. Attempts to slow the environment often fail because the surrounding rhythm continues regardless of individual intention. Instead, the challenge lies in selective engagement. Choosing when to participate and when to step back becomes essential. Brief moments of disconnection can restore focus, even if complete withdrawal is unrealistic. Without such pauses, distraction accumulates, and the ability to think coherently diminishes.

This condition has implications beyond individual well-being. In professional settings, particularly those involving collaboration, a frantic pace can both enhance and undermine outcomes. Brainstorming sessions flourish, networking expands, and information circulates rapidly. Yet strategic planning suffers. Long-term consequences are harder to evaluate when attention is constantly redirected. For this reason, important conclusions reached during such periods may later require revision.

The influence of a frantic pace extends even further, touching the realm of international law. At first glance, the link between daily communication patterns and global legal systems may seem tenuous. International law is shaped by negotiation, dialogue and consensus building, all of which depend on human communication. When the pace of interaction accelerates, the processes that underpin legal agreements are affected.

Modern international law operates in an environment already characterised by rapid information exchange. Diplomatic communications are instantaneous, media scrutiny is continuous and public opinion shifts quickly. During periods of intensified interaction, these tendencies are amplified. States engage in more frequent consultations, emergency meetings become common and informal channels of communication gain prominence. This can be beneficial in situations requiring swift coordination, such as humanitarian responses or conflict de-escalation. Rapid dialogue can prevent misunderstandings from escalating and allow for timely cooperation.

The same speed can undermine the deliberative nature of international law. Treaties, conventions and customary norms are traditionally developed through careful negotiation, precise language and extended reflection. A frantic communicative environment risks compressing these stages. There is pressure to respond quickly to events, to issue statements and to demonstrate engagement. As a result, legal positions may be articulated before they are fully considered. Ambiguities in wording can emerge, later giving rise to disputes over interpretation.

Furthermore, increased interaction does not necessarily equate to deeper consensus. When discussions multiply, attention fragments. Delegations may struggle to maintain coherent strategies across numerous parallel conversations. Informal agreements reached in haste may conflict with formal obligations. This creates legal uncertainty, particularly when expectations formed during rapid exchanges are not later reflected in binding instruments.

Another effect concerns the role of individuals within international law. Diplomats, legal advisers and negotiators are subject to the same cognitive limits as anyone else. Continuous engagement without adequate reflection can impair judgement. In high-pressure environments, there is a greater risk of overlooking long-term implications in favour of immediate diplomatic gains. This can weaken the durability of agreements and erode trust between parties.

The frantic pace also affects transparency and accountability. International law relies on clear records of intent and obligation. When communication occurs across numerous platforms and in rapid succession, maintaining accurate documentation becomes more challenging. Informal messages, press briefings and public remarks may carry legal significance, even if they were not intended to do so. Later, these statements can be cited as evidence of state practice or opinio juris, influencing the development of customary international law.

In addition, the acceleration of interaction influences dispute resolution. International courts and tribunals operate on principles of careful reasoning and procedural fairness. Yet they do not exist in isolation from the broader communicative environment. Public commentary and political pressure can intensify during fast-moving periods, creating expectations for swift outcomes. While efficiency is desirable, excessive haste risks undermining the perceived legitimacy of legal decisions.

There is also an impact on smaller states and less-resourced actors. In a highly accelerated environment, those with greater administrative capacity can participate more fully in numerous discussions. Others may struggle to keep up, leading to imbalances in influence. This challenges the principle of sovereign equality that underpins international law. When participation becomes a function of speed rather than substance, inclusivity suffers.

Despite these risks, a frantic pace is not inherently detrimental to international law. When managed thoughtfully, it can foster innovation and responsiveness. New forms of cooperation may emerge through frequent interaction. Networks of experts can share knowledge quickly, improving the quality of legal analysis. The key lies in recognising the limits of continuous engagement and preserving spaces for reflection within the broader flow of communication.

International institutions have a role to play in this regard. By structuring negotiations with clear phases, allowing for pauses and emphasising written submissions, they can counterbalance the pressures of speed. Encouraging transparency and documentation helps ensure that rapid exchanges do not obscure legal commitments. In this way, the energy of a frantic pace can be harnessed without sacrificing legal integrity.

Ultimately, the experience of a frantic pace highlights a fundamental tension in both personal life and international law. Speed enables connection, responsiveness and adaptability. Slowness enables understanding, judgement and stability. Neither can be abandoned without consequence. The challenge is not to eliminate speed, but to integrate it with moments of deliberate stillness.

For individuals, this means accepting that not every conversation requires immediate resolution. It means allowing some questions to remain open until the mind is ready to address them properly. For the international legal community, it means resisting the urge to finalise positions before their implications are fully understood. In both cases, wisdom lies in knowing when to engage fully and when to step back.

A frantic pace will always be part of human societies, particularly in times of change. Its effects are powerful, shaping relationships, decisions and legal structures. By approaching such periods with awareness and restraint, it becomes possible to benefit from heightened interaction without losing clarity. The weeks may be busy, loud and demanding, but they need not leave lasting confusion if balanced with intentional pauses and thoughtful judgment.

XXX